M
Make4.6/5vsn8
n8n (Self-hosted)4.5/5Make vs n8n (Self-hosted) (March 2026)
| MMake | n8n8n (Self-hosted) | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | Free |
| Rating | 4.6/5 | 4.5/5 |
| Free Tier | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes |
| Best For | Complex automations, Developers | Technical teams and developers needing custom automations, Startups and small businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness |
Quick Verdict
Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 rating versus n8n (Self-hosted)'s 4.5/5, offering stronger value for most teams.
Quick Overview
M
Make
Visual automation platform with powerful scenarios for complex workflow automation.
- Best for: Complex automations, Developers
- Starting price: Free
- Category: Automation Tools
- Founded: 2012
- Pricing model: freemium
n8
n8n (Self-hosted)
Open-source workflow automation platform that combines visual no-code editing with full code flexibility for building co...
- Best for: Technical teams and developers needing custom automations, Startups and small businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness
- Starting price: Free
- Category: Automation Tools
- Founded: 2019
- Pricing model: freemium
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Make | n8n (Self-hosted) |
|---|---|---|
| App Integrations | ✓ | ✗ |
| Multi-step Workflows | ✓ | ✗ |
| Conditional Logic | ✓ | ✗ |
| Scheduling | ✓ | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | ✗ |
| Data Formatting | ✓ | ✗ |
| API Access | ✓ | ✗ |
| Team Features | ✓ | ✗ |
| Visual Workflow Editor | ✗ | ✓ |
| Code Flexibility | ✗ | ✓ |
| 400+ Integrations | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI & LangChain Integration | ✗ | ✓ |
| Self-hosting | ✗ | ✓ |
| Git Version Control | ✗ | ✓ |
| Advanced Debugging | ✗ | ✓ |
| Queue Mode Scaling | ✗ | ✓ |
| Enterprise Security | ✗ | ✓ |
| Template Library | ✗ | ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
Prices last verified: March 16, 2026
Make
Free
Starting price
freemium · 5 plans
Free
FreeCore
$9/moProPopular
$16/moTeams
$29/moEnterprise
Freen8n (Self-hosted)
Free
Starting price
freemium · 3 plans
Self-hostedPopular
FreeCloud Community
FreeCloud Enterprise
$50/moPros & Cons
Make
Pros
- More affordable
- Visual scenario builder
- Complex logic support
- Better data handling
Cons
- Steeper learning curve
- Fewer integrations
- UI can be confusing
- Less documentation
n8n (Self-hosted)
Pros
- Completely free self-hosted version with unlimited usage
- Hybrid visual/code approach suits both developers and non-coders
- Extensive integration library with 400+ pre-built connectors
- Strong AI capabilities with LangChain and custom model support
Cons
- Steeper learning curve compared to pure no-code tools
- Requires technical knowledge for self-hosting and maintenance
- Cloud pricing can become expensive for high-volume usage
- Less hand-holding for beginners than traditional automation tools
Which Is Best for You?
M
Choose Make if:
- Complex automations
- Developers
- Data-heavy workflows
- Budget-conscious teams
- You want to start with a free plan
- Higher user rating matters to you (4.6 vs 4.5)
n8
Choose n8n (Self-hosted) if:
- Technical teams and developers needing custom automations
- Startups and small businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness
- Organizations requiring data sovereignty and on-premises hosting
- Teams building AI-powered workflows and complex integrations
- You want to start with a free plan
Our Verdict
🏆
MMake — Winnern8n8n (Self-hosted) — Runner-up
After thorough analysis, Make takes the lead in this comparison with a higher rating of 4.6/5 versus n8n (Self-hosted)'s 4.5/5.
Make is best for Complex automations and Developers. More affordable.
n8n (Self-hosted) remains a strong alternative, especially for Technical teams and developers needing custom automations and Startups and small businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Completely free self-hosted version with unlimited usage.
Pricing-wise, Make is the more affordable starting option. Evaluate free trials of both before committing.
Explore More
Make Alternatives
n8n (Self-hosted) Alternatives
Category Resources
Related Reading
Frequently Asked Questions
Make edges ahead with a 4.6/5 rating versus n8n (Self-hosted)'s 4.5/5, offering stronger value for most teams.
Make starts at Free/mo (free tier available), while n8n (Self-hosted) starts at Free/mo (free tier available).
Yes. Most users can migrate data between the two. Check both platforms for import/export tools before switching.
Make integrates with 1000+ apps including Google, Microsoft, Slack, Shopify. n8n (Self-hosted) integrates with Salesforce, Slack, Gmail, Asana. Both offer solid third-party connectivity, though the best choice depends on your existing tech stack.
Both tools are designed for ease of use. Make is best for Complex automations and Developers, while n8n (Self-hosted) excels for Technical teams and developers needing custom automations and Startups and small businesses prioritizing cost-effectiveness. Consider trying both free trials to judge which interface suits your workflow.
Make has a 4.6/5 rating from 800 reviews, while n8n (Self-hosted) scores 4.5/5 from 1,250 reviews. Higher review counts generally indicate a more established support ecosystem.
For small businesses, Make may be more budget-friendly starting at Free. However, n8n (Self-hosted) (Free) could offer better value depending on the features you need most.
For enterprise use, consider which offers more advanced plans. Make has 5 plans while n8n (Self-hosted) has 3 plans. Evaluate each tool's enterprise features, security compliance, and team management capabilities before committing.
Check each tool's website for the latest mobile app availability. Both Make and n8n (Self-hosted) offer web-based access, and many modern SaaS tools provide companion mobile apps for iOS and Android.
Choose Make if you prioritize more affordable and want to start free. Choose n8n (Self-hosted) if you value completely free self-hosted version with unlimited usage and want a free tier.