TemperStack
In
InVision4.2/5
vs
Lu
Lunacy4.2/5

InVision vs Lunacy (March 2026)

InInVisionLuLunacy
PriceFreeFree
Rating4.2 4.2/54.2 4.2/5
Free Tier✓ Yes✓ Yes
Best ForUX/UI designers, Design teams needing collaborationUI/UX designers needing Sketch/Figma alternatives on Windows/Linux, Teams collaborating on web/vector designs with offline access
Quick Verdict

Both InVision and Lunacy earn a 4.2/5 rating — your choice depends on which feature set and pricing model fits your workflow best.

Quick Overview

In

InVision

A design prototyping and collaboration platform that was shut down in December 2024. Previously offered interactive wire...

  • Best for: UX/UI designers, Design teams needing collaboration
  • Starting price: Free
  • Category: Design Tools
  • Founded: 2011
  • Pricing model: subscription
View Full Profile →
Lu

Lunacy

Lunacy is a versatile, free design tool combining Figma/Sketch strengths with 1.5M+ assets, AI features, and cross-platf...

  • Best for: UI/UX designers needing Sketch/Figma alternatives on Windows/Linux, Teams collaborating on web/vector designs with offline access
  • Starting price: Free
  • Category: Design Tools
  • Founded: 2010
  • Pricing model: freemium
View Full Profile →

Feature Comparison

FeatureInVisionLunacy
Interactive Prototyping
Design Handoff
Real-time Collaboration
Version Control
User Testing
Design System Management
Mobile Preview
Animation Tools
Whiteboarding
Presentation Mode
Asset Management
Password Protection
Real-time collaboration
Built-in graphic assets
AI background remover
AI image upscaler
Figma file support
Sketch file support
Cloud storage
Offline mode
Auto Layout
Prototyping
Multi-format export
UI kits
Components system
Cross-platform support

Pricing Comparison

Prices last verified: March 16, 2026

InVision

Free
Starting price
subscription · 3 plans
Free
Free
ProPopular
$15/mo
Team
$25/mo
View full InVision pricing →

Lunacy

Free
Starting price
freemium · 2 plans
FreePopular
Free
Pro
$11.99/mo
View full Lunacy pricing →

Pros & Cons

InVision

Pros
  • Intuitive prototyping interface
  • Strong collaboration features
  • Easy stakeholder sharing
  • Good animation capabilities
Cons
  • Service discontinued in 2024
  • Limited design creation tools
  • Performance issues with large prototypes
  • Expensive for small teams

Lunacy

Pros
  • Completely free with no paywalls for core design tools
  • Massive built-in asset library reduces external searches
  • Seamless Sketch/Figma compatibility for cross-platform teams
  • AI automation speeds up routine tasks
Cons
  • Attribution required for built-in graphics in free use
  • Limited simultaneous cloud editors (up to 10)
  • macOS version restricted to Mac App Store
  • Documentation-heavy for advanced features

Which Is Best for You?

In

Choose InVision if:

  • UX/UI designers
  • Design teams needing collaboration
  • Prototype testing and validation
  • Design handoff to developers
  • You want to start with a free plan
  • Budget is a priority (Free vs $11.99)
Lu

Choose Lunacy if:

  • UI/UX designers needing Sketch/Figma alternatives on Windows/Linux
  • Teams collaborating on web/vector designs with offline access
  • Rapid prototyping with AI tools and built-in assets
  • Freelancers handling handoff to developers
  • You want to start with a free plan

Our Verdict

🏆
InInVision — WinnerLuLunacy — Runner-up

After thorough analysis, InVision takes the lead in this comparison, though both tools share an identical 4.2/5 rating.

InVision is best for UX/UI designers and Design teams needing collaboration. Intuitive prototyping interface.

Lunacy remains a strong alternative, especially for UI/UX designers needing Sketch/Figma alternatives on Windows/Linux and Teams collaborating on web/vector designs with offline access. Completely free with no paywalls for core design tools.

Pricing-wise, InVision is the more affordable starting option. Evaluate free trials of both before committing.

Try InVisionTry Lunacy

Explore More

Frequently Asked Questions

Both InVision and Lunacy earn a 4.2/5 rating — your choice depends on which feature set and pricing model fits your workflow best.
InVision starts at Free/mo (free tier available), while Lunacy starts at $11.99/mo (free tier available).
Yes. Most users can migrate data between the two. Check both platforms for import/export tools before switching.
InVision integrates with Sketch, Figma, Adobe XD, Photoshop. Lunacy integrates with Figma, Sketch, Avocode, Zeplin. Both offer solid third-party connectivity, though the best choice depends on your existing tech stack.
Both tools are designed for ease of use. InVision is best for UX/UI designers and Design teams needing collaboration, while Lunacy excels for UI/UX designers needing Sketch/Figma alternatives on Windows/Linux and Teams collaborating on web/vector designs with offline access. Consider trying both free trials to judge which interface suits your workflow.
InVision has a 4.2/5 rating from 2,847 reviews, while Lunacy scores 4.2/5 from 700 reviews. Higher review counts generally indicate a more established support ecosystem.
For small businesses, InVision may be more budget-friendly starting at Free. However, Lunacy (Free) could offer better value depending on the features you need most.
For enterprise use, consider which offers more advanced plans. InVision has 3 plans while Lunacy has 2 plans. Evaluate each tool's enterprise features, security compliance, and team management capabilities before committing.
Check each tool's website for the latest mobile app availability. Both InVision and Lunacy offer web-based access, and many modern SaaS tools provide companion mobile apps for iOS and Android.
Choose InVision if you prioritize intuitive prototyping interface and want to start free. Choose Lunacy if you value completely free with no paywalls for core design tools and want a free tier.

Related Comparisons

Written by

S
Sarah Chen
Product Analyst

Sarah is a product analyst with 6 years of experience in the SaaS industry. She previously worked as a product manager at two successful B2B startups. Her reviews focus on user experience, feature depth, and real-world applicability.

Project ManagementCollaboration ToolsProductivity Software94 articles